Garmin Forerunner 965 Vs Garmin Forerunner 955

The Garmin Forerunner 965 and Garmin Forerunner 955 are among the best sports watches available, offering top-tier tracking, training analysis and navigation features, as well as useful smarts like music storage. Choosing between them mainly comes down to aesthetics, since the Forerunner 965 has a smarter design and a bright AMOLED display. If you’re not fussed about the screen, or looks in general, then the Forerunner 955 offers better value, and lasts longer on a charge.

Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Garmin Forerunner 955: Price And Availability

Garmin launched the Forerunner 965 in March 2023 with a price of $599.99 in the US and £599.99 in the UK. The Forerunner 955 Solar costs $599.99/£549.99, while the standard version of the watch is $499.99/£479.99, though you can often find the older watch in sales for less.

How I Tested These Watches

I tested the Forerunner 955 Solar and Forerunner 965 for our full reviews, wearing each watch for several weeks to track my training, which usually includes 50-60 miles of running a week, plus yoga, strength sessions and some cycling. I’ve also tested older versions of the watch like the Forerunner 935 and 945, along with most of Garmin’s range.


Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Garmin Forerunner 955

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)

All the important differences between the Forerunner 965 and Forerunner 955 watches are found in their design. The Forerunner 955 sticks to the all-plastic build that was used for the 935 and 945 watches, with a memory-in-pixel touchscreen display and solar panels on the solar version of the watch.

The Forerunner 965 not only upgrades the screen to AMOLED, but also adds a thin titanium bezel to the watch to give it a more elegant look. The screen is also bigger, at 1.4in on the 965 vs 1.3in on the 955, with the case size staying at 47mm because the bezel is smaller on the 965. Both watches weigh 52g, though the Forerunner 965 is thinner at 13.2mm vs 14.3mm.

I found the AMOLED display a clear upgrade on the duller memory-in-pixel display of the 955. The resolution has increased from 260 x 260 pixels on the 955 to 454 x 454 pixels on the 965, and it’s easier to read the AMOLED screen in most conditions, especially when indoors, under cloud cover or in dappled light.

When running in bright sunlight wearing sunglasses the Forerunner 955’s screen is easier to see than the AMOLED screen, but it is still easy enough to see your stats on the Forerunner 965 in the sun. I prefer the new AMOLED display for general use with the Forerunner 965, and when running in the UK, usually under cloud cover or in a local forest, it’s a clearer screen to read on the run. It reduces battery life a little, though.

Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Garmin Forerunner 955

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)

Another small change with the new watch is that it’s packaged with a charger that connects to a USB-C port, whereas the 955’s charger connects to a standard USB port. The charging port is the same on the watches themselves.

Both watches are packed with sensors to help you track your activity, including a barometric altimeter, compass and pulse oximeter. You can pair external sensors to the 955 and 965 via Bluetooth and ANT+, and they both have a 5ATM water resistance rating. Both watches also offer Garmin’s multi-band GPS tracking, which is more accurate than using GPS only, and they both have music storage as well as color maps. 

Battery Life

The battery life of the Forerunner 965 takes a hit because of its AMOLED screen, although it’s not too big a hit. I found that the 965 lasted me six or seven days on a charge with the always-on screen enabled, notifications coming in and the multi-band GPS mode engaged for all runs. 

Generally, I was running around 60 miles in that period, so triathletes also logging a lot of cycling may find it drains faster, but overall the battery life on the Forerunner 965 impressed me. It was only a couple of days less than I was getting from the Forerunner 955 Solar with the same use, with the older watch lasting me around eight days on average.

You will get more battery life from the Forerunner 955, especially if using the Solar version in sunny conditions, but the 955 is only likely to need charging a few days earlier, and if you change the screen from always-on to raise-to-wake it will last even longer.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0 Garmin Forerunner 965Garmin Forerunner 955Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar
Smartwatch mode23 days (7 days always-on)15 daysUp to 20 days
GPS-only31 hours 42 hoursUp to 49 hours
GPS-only with music10.5 hours10.5 hours10.5 hours
Multi-band GPS19 hours20 hoursUp to 22 hours
Multi-band GPS with music8.5 hours8.5 hours8.5 hours

Sports Tracking And Training Analysis

Garmin Forerunner 965 vs Garmin Forerunner 955

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)

For the most part, the Garmin Forerunner 965 and Forerunner 955 offer the same sports tracking and training analysis, and are excellent on both fronts with detailed tracking and analysis, including Garmin’s useful training readiness feature.

One difference is that the Forerunner 965 can track running dynamics stats, such as ground contact time and vertical oscillation from the wrist, whereas the Forerunner 955 needs to be connected to a sensor like the Garmin HRM-Pro Plus chest strap or foot pod to get those stats. 

Both offer a high level of GPS accuracy—they’re as good as anything on the market on this front—and the usual so-so optical heart rate tracking accuracy. Most of the time the heart rate tracking is OK, but there are still errors. I’d connect an external heart rate monitor to avoid incorrect readings that skew your training analysis.

Two new training analysis stats that were introduced on the Garmin Forerunner 965 are chronic training load and training load ratio. These stats are also going to be available on the Forerunner 955, with chronic training load tallying up your training load from the previous four weeks. This is then compared with your acute load—your training load in the last week—to give your training load ratio. You can use this stat to help make sure you don’t suddenly change the amount of training you’re doing.

Nick Harris-Fry
Senior writer

Nick Harris-Fry is a journalist who has been covering health and fitness since 2015. Nick is an avid runner, covering 70-110km a week, which gives him ample opportunity to test a wide range of running shoes and running gear. He is also the chief tester for fitness trackers and running watches, treadmills and exercise bikes, and workout headphones.