How To Pick The Best Garmin Watch For You

Best Garmin Watches 2024: Jump Menu

Garmin Forerunner 255 next to Garmin Forerunner 955

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)

The list in brief ↴
1. Best overall: Garmin Forerunner 265
2. Best for running: Garmin Forerunner 165 Music
3. Best for cycling: Garmin Forerunner 255
4. Best for triathlon: Garmin Forerunner 955
5. Best for swimming: Garmin Swim 2
6. Best smartwatch: Garmin Vivoactive 5
7. Best for hiking: Garmin Fenix 7X
How we test

Picking the best Garmin watch isn’t easy. The main reason: Garmin itself. The company has many watches in its range and while that means there will almost certainly be one that matches your preferences, it can be hard to find that watch without spending ages researching the differences between the devices.

You can, however, leave all that to me because I’ve tested pretty much every Garmin device that’s been released in the last five years and know the range like the back of my hand. Or wrist, in this case.

Garmin is renowned for making some of the best sports watches and running watches. Whatever your favorite form of exercise, the company has a device for you. I’ve picked out the best Garmin watch for a range of sports, along with my top overall pick that offers the best balance of value and features.

The quick list

Here’s a run-through of the top Garmin watches available in the most important categories. Click on any watch here to jump to its entry in the main list below.

Load the next 6 products ↴

How I Test Garmin Watches

Nick Harris-Fry
Nick Harris-Fry

I’ve been testing sports watches from many brands for more than five years and I’ve tried almost every Garmin released in that time: from the top-of-the-range Fenix and Marq watches to entry-level devices like the Forerunner 45. I’m primarily a runner and usually log 50-80 miles a week. I also test the devices with a range of other workouts including cycling, strength sessions and yoga. I test heart rate accuracy against a chest strap, and I’ve spent many hours poring over GPS tracks to check the accuracy of watches. 

In this round-up I’ve aimed to pick out the most affordable option in each category that still ticks the key boxes for that sport/purpose. If you’re not worried about spending big and you just want the best Garmin available, the TL;DR is that the Garmin Epix Pro 51mm is the one to go for.

Best overall

Garmin Forerunner 265

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)
Best overall

Specifications

RRP: $449.99 / £429.99
Battery life: 13 days (smartwatch), 20 hours (GPS)
Display: AMOLED

Reasons to buy

+
AMOLED display
+
Accurate multisport tracking
+
Useful smart features

Reasons to avoid

-
More expensive than Forerunner 255
-
No maps

The Forerunner 265 is a multisport watch with an AMOLED screen that offers useful training analysis, including Garmin’s readiness rating, on top of accurate sports tracking and smart features. It’s a great all-rounder that will suit you whatever your preferred sport is, and it’s a good smartwatch and general fitness tracker, too.

The price is still high, but the Forerunner 265 is considerably cheaper than top watches like the Forerunner 965 and Fenix/Epix ranges, which offer maps, longer battery life and more durable designs as an incentive to upgrade. If you aren’t fussed about the AMOLED display of Garmin’s training readiness feature, then the Forerunner 255 is a good, cheaper alternative to the Forerunner 265. Explore the differences between the two with my Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Garmin Forerunner 255 comparison.

Read more in my Garmin Forerunner 265 review

Best for running

Garmin Forerunner 165 screen showing log of runs. Screen conveys Friday’s run took 1hr 10min 55sec and was 18.89km, Thursday’s run took 56min 43 sec and was 12.09km, Wednesday’s run took 1hr 17min 29sec and was 21.21km

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)
Best for running

Specifications

RRP: $299.99 / £249.99 (non-music), $349.99 / £289.99 (music)
Battery life: 11 days (smartwatch), 20 hours (GPS)
Display: AMOLED

Reasons to buy

+
AMOLED display
+
Reliable run tracking
+
Impressive battery life
+
Music storage (165 Music only)

Reasons to avoid

-
No dual-band GPS
-
No triathlon mode
-
Less training analysis than others

The Forerunner 165 Music is the brand’s entry-level AMOLED watch and a great option for runners. It provides accurate GPS tracking (though it’s a shame it doesn’t have dual-band GPS as with more expensive Garmin watches), structured workouts and training plans you can follow on the watch, plus music storage and breadcrumb navigation.

If you find the Forerunner 255 in a deal for around the same price as the Forerunner 165 then that would be a strong alternative for those who don’t need or want an AMOLED screen, since the 255 has more insightful training analysis and dual-band GPS tracking. I’ve gone into more detail on the differences between the two in this Garmin Forerunner 255 vs Garmin Forerunner 165 article.

If you’re just starting out with running the cheaper Forerunner 55 is another good option that does the basics well.

Read more in my Garmin Forerunner 165 review

Best for cycling

Garmin Forerunner 255

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)
Best for cycling

Specifications

RRP: $349.99 / £299.99 (non-music), $399.99 / £349.99 (music)
Battery life: 14 days (smartwatch), 30 hours (GPS)
Display: LCD

Reasons to buy

+
Accurate multisport tracking
+
Often in sales
+
Dual-band GPS

Reasons to avoid

-
No training readiness feature
-
No AMOLED screen

Assuming you can find it in a sale (usually easy as it’s an older watch), the Forerunner 255 is the best-value Garmin watch, and could be the pick in a number of categories in this round-up. I’ve singled it out for cyclists as a more affordable option that has key features like power sensor support and a multisport mode, which you don’t get on cheaper Forerunners and Garmin smartwatches.

If you want an AMOLED display and training readiness the Forerunner 265 is a possible upgrade, or you could go up to the Forerunner 955 or 965 to get maps as well. You could also save by getting an entry-level watch like the Forerunner 55 and splash out on a Garmin bike computer instead, which is easier to view during rides.

Read more in my Garmin Forerunner 255 review

Best for triathlon

Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry/Future)
Best for triathlon

Specifications

RRP: $499.99 / 479.99
Battery life: 15 days (smartwatch), 42 hours (GPS)
Display: LCD

Reasons to buy

+
Better value than 965/Fenix/Epix
+
Lightweight design
+
Maps

Reasons to avoid

-
Plastic design
-
No AMOLED screen

Another old-but-excellent watch, the Forerunner 955 packs in the same excellent multisport features as the newer Forerunner 965 (minus the AMOLED display), and Fenix/Epix ranges, into a lightweight plastic design with an LCD display. It’s a better pick than the Forerunner 255 and 265 for triathletes tackling longer events in particular, since the extra battery life you get from the Forerunner 955 will be handy in an Ironman, for example. It supports all the sensors you need and will automatically transition between sports during multisport events.

The Forerunner 965 does all of the above and has a bright AMOLED display and a titanium bezel, to increase its durability a little, and of course triathletes are well served by the excellent Fenix 7 and Epix ranges, which have more durable designs than the 955 and come in a range of sizes. If you’re sticking to shorter races and don’t need maps, then the Forerunner 255 and 265 watches are also excellent for triathletes. See how the Forerunner 955 stacks up in my comparison of it alongside the Forerunner 255.

Read more in my Garmin Forerunner 955 review

Best for swimming

Garmin Swim 2

(Image credit: Charlie Allenby / Future)
Best for swimming

Specifications

RRP: $249.99 / £219.99
Battery life: 7 days (smartwatch mode), 13 hours (GPS)
Display: LCD

Reasons to buy

+
Small and light
+
All of Garmin's swimming features
+
More affordable than multisport watches

Reasons to avoid

-
Basic smartwatch features
-
Not a multisport watch
-
Unimpressive GPS battery performance

Most of the watches in Garmin’s range offer a lot to swimmers and if you also do other kinds of activity I’d suggest opting for a more rounded watch, such as the Forerunner 255 or 265, which match the swimming features of the Garmin Swim 2. However, if you just swim the Swim 2 is a cheaper alternative that has all the features you need to track pool and open-water workouts.

It’s a lightweight watch and records swimming-focused metrics, including distance, pace, stroke count, stroke type and Swolf. You can set up and follow swimming workouts on the watch and use it to measure your critical swim speed, which is an indication of your aerobic swimming threshold.

Read more in my Garmin Swim 2 review

Best smartwatch

Garmin Vivoactive 5

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)
Best smartwatch

Specifications

RRP: $299 / £259.99
Battery life: 11 days (smartwatch mode), 21 hours (GPS)
Display: AMOLED

Reasons to buy

+
Attractive design and AMOLED screen
+
Good sports tracking
+
Music storage
+
Cheaper than Venu 3

Reasons to avoid

-
Battery life not exceptional
-
No mic or speaker

The Vivoactive line is one of two dedicated smartwatch lines within Garmin’s range, along with the Venu line, but the same smart features are found across a wide array of Garmin devices. These include music storage, NFC payments, notifications and access to the Connect IQ apps store (which is limited compared with the Apple or Google app offerings).

You get all of this on the Vivoactive 5 at a lower price than other smart Garmins, aside from the cheaper Venu Sq watches, which are not as attractive and enjoyable to use in my experience. If you upgrade to the Venu 3 you get a mic and speaker, which is a handy feature in a smartwatch, and you do get better sports tracking and training analysis from the likes of the Forerunner 265, which also has the same smart features as the Vivoactive 5.

Read more in my Garmin Vivoactive 5 review

Best for hiking

Garmin Fenix 7 Pro on wooden table

(Image credit: Nick Harris-Fry / Future)
Best for hiking

Specifications

RRP: $299 / £649.99
Battery life: 28 days/37 with solar (smartwatch mode), 89 hours/122 hours with solar (GPS)
Display: LCD

Reasons to buy

+
Top-notch sports tracking
+
Long battery life
+
Built-in flashlight
+
Maps

Reasons to avoid

-
Expensive
-
Larger and heavier than other Garmins

Hikers heading on adventures in the great outdoors will benefit from the long battery life of Garmin’s Fenix and Enduro watches, which also have maps to help you navigate. The Fenix 7X Solar has solar panels around the outside of the face to extend the battery life more in sunny conditions, and I’ve picked it out over the smaller Fenix 7S and 7X because it has a built-in flashlight, a handy extra for those who camp in particular.

The newer Fenix 7 Pro range all have built-in flashlights but you pay more for a watch that otherwise isn’t an upgrade on the Fenix 7 range. The Enduro 2 has a flashlight and the longest battery life, but is expensive. A cheaper option for hiking than the Fenix 7X is the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar, which doesn’t have maps, but does have a rugged design, breadcrumb navigation and long battery life. My head-to-head comparison pits the Fenix 7 against the Enduro 2.

Read more in my Garmin Fenix 7X Solar review

Nick Harris-Fry
Senior writer

Nick Harris-Fry is a journalist who has been covering health and fitness since 2015. Nick is an avid runner, covering 70-110km a week, which gives him ample opportunity to test a wide range of running shoes and running gear. He is also the chief tester for fitness trackers and running watches, treadmills and exercise bikes, and workout headphones.